Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
: 20 | 50 | 100
1 - 20 de 1.048
1.
Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol ; 20(4): 225-233, 2024 Apr.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38600865

INTRODUCTION: Cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) 4/6 inhibitors are cornerstones in the treatment of Hormone Receptor (HR) positive and Human Epidermal Growth factor (HER2) negative metastatic breast cancer. Given their widespread use in the metastatic setting and emerging use in the adjuvant setting, studying drug-drug interactions (DDI) of these medications is of utmost importance. AREAS COVERED: This review provides key background information on the CDK4/6 inhibitors, palbociclib, ribociclib, and abemaciclib. We discuss drug-drug interactions including those with proton pump inhibitors as well as CYP3A substrates, inhibitors, and inducers. We describe the effect of these drugs on membrane transporters and their substrates as well as those drugs that increase risk of CDK4/6 toxicities. Finally, we explore future directions for strategies to minimize drug-drug interactions. EXPERT OPINION: It is crucial to be mindful of medications that may interfere with drug absorption, such as proton pump inhibitors, as well as those that interfere with drug metabolism, such as CYP3A4 inhibitors and inducers. Additionally, special consideration should be given to populations at higher risk for polypharmacy, such as older patients with greater comorbidities. These interactions and patient characteristics should be considered when developing individual treatment plans with CDK4/6 inhibitors.


Breast Neoplasms , Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 4 , Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 6 , Drug Interactions , Protein Kinase Inhibitors , Humans , Breast Neoplasms/drug therapy , Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 4/antagonists & inhibitors , Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 6/antagonists & inhibitors , Female , Protein Kinase Inhibitors/adverse effects , Protein Kinase Inhibitors/administration & dosage , Protein Kinase Inhibitors/pharmacology , Protein Kinase Inhibitors/pharmacokinetics , Antineoplastic Agents/adverse effects , Antineoplastic Agents/administration & dosage , Antineoplastic Agents/pharmacology , Antineoplastic Agents/pharmacokinetics , Proton Pump Inhibitors/administration & dosage , Proton Pump Inhibitors/pharmacology , Proton Pump Inhibitors/adverse effects , Aminopyridines/administration & dosage , Aminopyridines/adverse effects , Aminopyridines/pharmacology , Benzimidazoles/administration & dosage , Benzimidazoles/pharmacology , Benzimidazoles/adverse effects , Pyridines/administration & dosage , Pyridines/adverse effects , Pyridines/pharmacology , Pyridines/pharmacokinetics
2.
Drug Metab Pharmacokinet ; 55: 100995, 2024 Apr.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38447327

Pazopanib exhibits pH-dependent solubility and its absorption depends primarily on the stomach pH. Significant decrease of pazopanib absorption by coadministration with proton pump inhibitors in clinical situation need to be overcome. Thus, the purpose of this study is firstly to investigate the effect of acidic beverages and sodium citrate buffer on the solubility of pazopanib and secondly to examine the effect of sodium citrate buffer on pazopanib absorption in a rat model with esomeprazole-mediated gastric acid suppression. Pazopanib solubility decreased with increasing pH of sodium citrate buffer in vitro. Interestingly, its solubility in some acidic beverages was significantly lower than that in sodium citrate buffer of the same pH. The AUC0-24h of pazopanib administered in tap water to rats treated with esomeprazole (ESP rats) was 66 % lower than that in the control rats treated with saline. However, AUC0-24h was 4.8 times higher in ESP rats that received pazopanib with sodium citrate buffer (pH 2.3) compared to ESP rats that received pazopanib with tap water. Our results indicate that the drug-drug interactions between pazopanib and proton pump inhibitors can be overcome, at least in part, by suspending pazopanib in sodium citrate buffer.


Esomeprazole , Indazoles , Proton Pump Inhibitors , Pyrimidines , Sulfonamides , Rats , Animals , Proton Pump Inhibitors/pharmacology , Esomeprazole/pharmacology , Sodium Citrate , Solubility , Gastric Acid , Sodium , Water , Hydrogen-Ion Concentration
3.
Postgrad Med ; 136(2): 131-140, 2024 Mar.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38385191

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection are different disease states that are united by the core role of acid suppression in their management. In GERD, proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) have long been standard therapy based on abundant positive clinical trial data supporting their efficacy and safety. In H. pylori, PPIs are also a critical element of therapy in combination with 1 or more antibiotics to achieve and maintain a pH that maximizes the efficacy of therapy. Despite the considerable clinical success and widespread use of PPIs, room remains for agents with differentiated pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles. The potassium-competitive acid blockers (PCABs) are mechanistically distinct from PPIs but are acid-stable and do not require activation of the proton pump by coadministration of food. In pharmacodynamic studies, these agents have shown greater durations of acid suppression above the critical threshold of pH 4 (for GERD) and pH 6 (for H. pylori), which have been shown to optimize therapeutic efficacy in these settings. These results have translated in clinical studies to similar and, in some cases, improved outcomes relative to PPIs in these disease states. This review summarizes current knowledge on the physiology of acid secretion, pathophysiology and management of GERD and H. pylori, and key characteristics and clinical trial data for PPIs and PCABs.


Gastroesophageal Reflux , Helicobacter Infections , Helicobacter pylori , Proton Pump Inhibitors , Gastroesophageal Reflux/drug therapy , Humans , Helicobacter pylori/drug effects , Proton Pump Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Proton Pump Inhibitors/pharmacology , Helicobacter Infections/drug therapy , Gastric Acid/metabolism , Hydrogen-Ion Concentration , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology
4.
Drug Des Devel Ther ; 18: 193-213, 2024.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38318501

Ulcer disorders including the oral mucosa, large intestine, and stomach mucosa, cause significant global health burdens. Conventional treatments such as non-steroid anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), histamine H2 receptor antagonists (H2RAs), and cytoprotective agents have drawbacks like mucosal injury, diminish gastric acid secretion, and interact with concurrent medications. Therefore, alternative therapeutic approaches are needed to tackle this health concern. Plants are rich in active metabolites in the bark, roots, leaves, fruits, and seeds, and have been utilized for medicinal purposes since ancient times. The use of herbal therapy is crucial, and regulations are necessary to ensure the quality of products, particularly in randomized studies, to assess their efficacy and safety in treating ulcer disorders. This study aims to explore the anti-ulcer activity of medicinal plants in treating peptic ulcer disease, ulcerative colitis, and aphthous ulcers. Articles were searched in Scopus and PubMed, and filtered for publication from 2013 to 2023, resulting in a total of 460 from Scopus and 239 from PubMed. The articles were further screened by title and abstract and resulted in 55 articles. Natural products, rich in active metabolites, were described to manage ulcer disease by protecting the mucosa, reducing ulcer effects, inhibiting pro-inflammatory factors, and reducing bacterial load, thus improving patients' quality of life. Natural extracts have proven effective in managing other health problems, including ulcers by reducing pain and decreasing lesions. This review provides an overview of preclinical and clinical studies on medicinal plants, focusing on their effectiveness in treating conditions like peptic ulcers, ulcerative colitis, and aphthous ulcers.


Anti-Ulcer Agents , Colitis, Ulcerative , Peptic Ulcer , Stomatitis, Aphthous , Humans , Ulcer , Colitis, Ulcerative/drug therapy , Stomatitis, Aphthous/drug therapy , Quality of Life , Peptic Ulcer/drug therapy , Anti-Ulcer Agents/pharmacology , Anti-Ulcer Agents/therapeutic use , Histamine H2 Antagonists , Proton Pump Inhibitors/pharmacology , Proton Pump Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/therapeutic use
5.
Sci Rep ; 14(1): 4912, 2024 02 28.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38418852

Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) resistance is the most important risk factor for eradication failure. However, in most regions, antibiotic resistance rates of H. pylori in patients with different types of gastric mucosal lesions are still unclear. An 8-year clinical retrospective cohort study involving 2847 patients was performed. In this study, we first summarized and compared the resistance status of H. pylori in different years, ages, sexes, and gastric diseases. The resistance profiles of amoxicillin (AMX), clarithromycin (CLR), levofloxacin (LVX) and furazolidone (FR) and their changing trends in the clinic were described. Then, multiple antibiotic resistance in different gastric diseases and years were described and compared. The relationship between proton pump inhibitor (PPI) medication history and antibiotic resistance in H. pylori was also explored. Finally, an antibiotic resistance risk model was constructed for clinical resistance risk prediction. The overall resistance rates of AMX, CLR, LVX and FR in gastric diseases were 8.18%, 38.11%, 43.98%, and 13.73%, respectively. The mono resistance, double resistance, triple resistance, and quadruple resistance rates were 30.17%, 25.96%, 6.46%, and 0.63%, respectively. Compared with the period from 2014 to 2016, the rates of mono-resistance and multiple resistance all showed relatively downward trends in the past 5 years. Factors including age, sex, type of gastric lesions and recent PPI treatment history are associated with the antibiotic resistance rate of H. pylori. Atrophic gastritis is an important clinical feature of high-risk antibiotic resistance in H. pylori-infected patients. Patients with atrophic gastritis have higher risk of resistant strains infection. In this study, our data provide the association between antibiotic resistance of H. pylori and gastritis pattern, which indicate the higher risk of resistant strain infection if the patients with atrophic gastritis, PPI history and older age.


Gastritis, Atrophic , Helicobacter Infections , Helicobacter pylori , Stomach Diseases , Humans , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Helicobacter Infections/drug therapy , Helicobacter Infections/epidemiology , Retrospective Studies , Amoxicillin/pharmacology , Clarithromycin/therapeutic use , Stomach Diseases/drug therapy , Levofloxacin/pharmacology , Proton Pump Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Proton Pump Inhibitors/pharmacology , Furazolidone/pharmacology , Furazolidone/therapeutic use , Drug Resistance, Bacterial , Metronidazole/pharmacology
6.
Front Cell Infect Microbiol ; 14: 1296151, 2024.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38304196

Introduction: Azole resistance has been increasingly reported and become an issue for clinical managements of invasive mycoses. New strategy with combination therapy arises as a valuable and promising alternative option. The aim of the present study is to investigate the in vitro combinational effect of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) and azoles against pathogenic fungi. Methods: In vitro interactions of PPIs including omeprazole (OME), lansoprazole (LAN), pantoprazole (PAN), and rabeprazole (RAB), and commonly used azoles including itraconazole (ITC), posaconazole (POS), voriconazole (VRC) and fluconazole (FLC), were investigated via broth microdilution chequerboard procedure adapted from the CLSI M27-A3 and M38-A2. A total of 67 clinically isolated strains, namely 27 strains of Aspergillus spp., 16 strains of Candida spp., and 24 strains of dematiaceous fungi, were studied. C. parapsilosis (ATCC 22019) and A. flavus (ATCC 204304) was included to ensure quality control. Results: PPIs individually did not exert any significant antifungal activity. The combination of OME with ITC, POS, or VRC showed synergism against 77.6%, 86.6%, and 4% strains of tested pathogenic fungi, respectively, while synergism of OME/FLC was observed in 50% strains of Candida spp. Synergism between PAN and ITC, POS, or VRC was observed against 47.8%, 77.6% and 1.5% strains of tested fungi, respectively, while synergism of PNA/FLC was observed in 50% strains of Candida spp. Synergism of LAN with ITC, POS, or VRC was observed against 86.6%, 86.6%, and 3% of tested strains, respectively, while synergism of LAN/FLC was observed in 31.3% strains of Candida spp. Synergy of the combination of RAB with ITC, POS, or VRC was observed against 25.4%, 64.2%, and 4.5% of tested strains, respectively, while synergism of RAB/FLC was observed in 12.5% of Candida spp.. Among PPIs, synergism was least observed between RAB and triazoles, while among triazoles, synergism was least observed between VRC and PPIs. Among species, synergy was much more frequently observed in Aspergillus spp. and dematiaceous fungi as compared to Candida spp. Antagonism between PPIs with ITC or VRC was occasionally observed in Aspergillus spp. and dematiaceous fungi. It is notable that PPIs combined with azoles showed synergy against azole resistant A. fumigatus, and resulted in category change of susceptibility of ITC and POS against Candida spp. Discussion: The results suggested that PPIs combined with azoles has the potential to enhance the susceptibilities of azoles against multiple pathogenic fungi and could be a promising strategy to overcome azole resistance issues. However, further investigations are warranted to study the combinational efficacy in more isolates and more species, to investigate the underlying mechanism of interaction and to evaluate the potential for concomitant use of these agents in human.


Azoles , Proton Pump Inhibitors , Humans , Azoles/pharmacology , Proton Pump Inhibitors/pharmacology , Fungi , Antifungal Agents/pharmacology , Triazoles/pharmacology , Voriconazole/pharmacology , Fluconazole/pharmacology , Candida , Aspergillus , Candida parapsilosis , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Drug Resistance, Fungal
7.
Int J Mol Sci ; 25(2)2024 Jan 19.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38279248

This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the efficacy of dexlansoprazole (a proton pump inhibitor-PPI) in resolving heartburn, reflux, and other symptoms and complications resulting from gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). The study followed PRISMA 2020 and was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42020206513). The search strategy used MeSH and free terms appropriately adapted for each database. Only randomized clinical trials (RCTs) were included. The Cochrane tool (RoB 2.0) was used to assess the risk of bias, and the certainty of evidence was rated using GRADE. Ten RCTs were included. Dexlansoprazole outperformed the placebo and other PPIs in the resolution of heartburn and reflux symptoms in patients with GERD, with benefits during and after treatment, especially in those with moderate and severe symptoms. The meta-analyses indicated that dexlansoprazole at doses of 30 and 60 mg had more 24 h heartburn-free days and nights compared to the placebo medications; no difference was reported between dexlansoprazole at doses of 30 and 60 mg in heartburn-free nights. A low bias risk and a moderate certainty of evidence were observed. This review confirms the therapeutic effect of dexlansoprazole (placebo-controlled) and its improvements in GERD symptoms compared to another PPI. However, the interpretation of the results should be carried out cautiously due to the small number of included studies and other reported limitations.


Dexlansoprazole , Gastroesophageal Reflux , Proton Pump Inhibitors , Humans , Dexlansoprazole/therapeutic use , Gastroesophageal Reflux/drug therapy , Heartburn/chemically induced , Heartburn/drug therapy , Proton Pump Inhibitors/pharmacology , Proton Pump Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Treatment Outcome
8.
Transl Psychiatry ; 14(1): 27, 2024 Jan 16.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38228604

Obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) is a highly prevalent neuropsychiatric disorder poorly controlled with pharmacological treatment because of the wide variation in symptom patterns. We analysed real-world data on adverse self-reports and insurance claims to identify a novel therapeutic target for OCD. We found that dopamine D2 receptor (D2R) agonists increased the incidence of OCD-like symptoms, which were suppressed by the concomitant use of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs). Further, OCD-like repetitive and habitual behaviours were observed in mice repeatedly injected with a D2R agonist, quinpirole. However, these abnormalities were suppressed by short-term PPI treatment. In quinpirole-treated mice, PPI inhibited pyramidal neuron hyperactivity in the lateral orbitofrontal cortex, a region where the P-type proton pump gene Atp4a is abundantly expressed. In primary cultured cortical neurons, short-term PPI treatment lowered intracellular pH and decreased firing activity, which was mimicked by Atp4a knockdown. Our findings show that inhibition of P-type proton pumps may be a novel therapeutic strategy for OCD.


Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder , Proton Pump Inhibitors , Mice , Animals , Quinpirole/pharmacology , Proton Pump Inhibitors/pharmacology , Proton Pump Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder/drug therapy , Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder/etiology , Neurons , Hydrogen-Ion Concentration
9.
Sci Rep ; 14(1): 2520, 2024 01 30.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38291115

We elucidated the efficacy of gut microbiome-altering drugs on pembrolizumab efficacy in patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC). Clinical data were analyzed retrospectively from 133 patients with mUC who received second-line pembrolizumab therapy between January 2018 and January 2021, following failed platinum-based chemotherapy. We evaluated the effects of gut microbiome-altering drugs (proton pump inhibitors [PPI]/potassium-competitive acid blockers [P-CAB], H2 blockers, antibiotics, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs [NSAIDs], metformin, antipsychotics, steroids, and opioids), taken by patients within 30 days before/after pembrolizumab treatment, on progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Fifty-one patients received PPI/P-CAB (37/14, respectively); H2 blockers, 7; antibiotics, 35; NSAIDs, 22; antipsychotics, 8; metformin, 3; steroids, 11; and opioids, 29. Kaplan-Meier curves revealed PPI or P-CAB users showed shorter PFS than non-PPI-P-CAB users (p = 0.001, p = 0.005, respectively). Multivariate analysis highlighted PPI/P-CAB use as the only independent prognostic factor for disease progression (hazards ratio: 1.71, 95% confidence interval: 1.14-2.07, p = 0.010) but not death (p = 0.177). Proton pump inhibitors/potassium-competitive acid blockers may decrease the efficacy of pembrolizumab therapy for mUC, possibly via gut microbiome modulation.


Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized , Carcinoma, Transitional Cell , Metformin , Urinary Bladder Neoplasms , Humans , Proton Pump Inhibitors/pharmacology , Proton Pump Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Carcinoma, Transitional Cell/drug therapy , Retrospective Studies , Urinary Bladder Neoplasms/pathology , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/therapeutic use , Steroids/therapeutic use , Metformin/therapeutic use
10.
J Clin Gastroenterol ; 58(4): 337-341, 2024 Apr 01.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37267311

GOALS: We aimed to examine the response rate to proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) and potassium-competitive acid blockers and the prevalence of topical corticosteroid (TCS) therapy as the second-line treatment for eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE). BACKGROUND: Acid-suppressive drugs such as PPIs and potassium-competitive acid blockers are often used to treat EoE. Treatment response is based on outcomes including symptoms, endoscopy, and histology; however, the detailed response rate to PPI/P-CAB is unknown. STUDY: In total, 236 patients with histologically confirmed EoE who received PPI/P-CAB as the first-line treatment were included. We assessed the symptoms, endoscopic reference score (EREFS), and histology [eosinophils per high-power field (eos/hpf)] 8 weeks after PPI/P-CAB administration. Complete normalization was defined as the disappearance of symptoms, EREFS score 0, or 0-1 eos/hpf, and response as disappearance or improvement of symptoms, EREFS score ≤2, or <15 eos/hpf. The prevalence of TCS therapy in each response group was assessed. RESULTS: Complete normalization was achieved in 25%, 50%, 36%, and 8% of patients for symptoms, endoscopy, histology, and all 3 outcomes, respectively. The response rates were 81%, 87%, 87%, 75%, and 60% for symptoms, endoscopy, histology, and all 3 outcomes, respectively. TCS use was significantly lower (8%) in patients who achieved response of all 3 outcomes than in other groups and was dependent on the number of outcomes with nonresponse. CONCLUSIONS: Complete normalization of symptoms, endoscopy, and histology using PPI/P-CAB is uncommon. Based on treatment efficacy by response/nonresponse, TCS was the secondary treatment in cases with an increase in the number of nonresponse outcomes.


Enteritis , Eosinophilia , Eosinophilic Esophagitis , Gastritis , Humans , Eosinophilic Esophagitis/diagnosis , Proton Pump Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Proton Pump Inhibitors/pharmacology , Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal , Treatment Outcome
11.
Pharmacotherapy ; 44(2): 171-183, 2024 Feb.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38049205

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Acid-suppressive drugs (ASDs) are widely used in many gastric acid-associated diseases. Nocturnal acid breakthrough has been a common problem of many ASDs, such as proton-pump inhibitors (PPIs) and H2 -receptor antagonists (H2RAs). Potassium-competitive acid blockers (P-CABs) are expected to solve this continuing conundrum. This article examined major ASDs and compared them with placebo in terms of nocturnal acid-inhibitory effects, using a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). METHODS: To compare the effectiveness of major ASDs, a Bayesian network meta-analysis (NMA) was applied to process data extracted from RCTs. The plausible ranking for each regimen and some subgroups were assessed by surface under the cumulative ranking curves (SUCRA). RESULTS: Fifty-five RCTs were conducted with 2015 participants. In terms of nocturnal acid-inhibitory effects, the overall results showed that tegoprazan (SUCRA 91.8%) and vonoprazan (SUCRA 91.0%) had the best performance, followed by new PPIs (including tenatoprazole and ilaprazole) (SUCRA 76.6%), additional H2RAs once at bedtime (AHB) (SUCRA 61.3%), isomer PPIs (including esomeprazole and dexlansoprazole) (SUCRA 38.6%), revaprazan (SUCRA 34.7%), traditional PPIs (including omeprazole, rabeprazole, pantoprazole, lansoprazole) (SUCRA 32.6%), H2RAs (SUCRA 23.1%), and placebo (SUCRA 0.3%). In some subgroups, the nocturnal acid-inhibitory effect of vonoprazan or tegoprazan was better than most of the other regimens, even new PPIs and AHB. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to compare the effect of ASDs on inhibiting nocturnal acid breakthrough. Overall, in terms of nocturnal acid-inhibitory effect, vonoprazan and tegoprazan had an advantage against other regimens including H2RAs, isomer PPIs, traditional PPIs, AHB, and new PPIs. Even in some subgroups, such as language classification (English), types of study design (crossover-RCT), age (≤40 years), BMI (18.5-24.9 kg/m2 ), continent (Asia and North America), disease status (health), the duration of therapy (2 weeks), and time of administration (at daytime or at night-time), the nocturnal acid-inhibitory effect of vonoprazan or tegoprazan were better than most regimens, even AHB and new PPIs.


Benzene Derivatives , Histamine H2 Antagonists , Imidazoles , Proton Pump Inhibitors , Pyrroles , Sulfonamides , Humans , Adult , Pharmaceutical Preparations , Network Meta-Analysis , Proton Pump Inhibitors/pharmacology , Proton Pump Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Rabeprazole , Histamine H2 Antagonists/pharmacology , Histamine H2 Antagonists/therapeutic use
12.
Eur J Pharm Sci ; 194: 106653, 2024 Mar 01.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38006986

As a widely used antidepressant that works by inhibiting the reuptake of serotonin, sertraline exerts an antidepressant effect depending on its concentration in the brain, which might be limited by the blood-brain barrier (BBB). It is highly possible to combine proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) with sertraline in clinical trials. Nevertheless, the role played by PPIs in regulating the transport of sertraline across the BBB remains unclear. Here, the impact of PPIs on the distribution of sertraline in the brain and the mechanisms involved were investigated. A mouse brain distribution study showed that Omeprazole (OME), Pantoprazole (PAN), Ilaprazole (ILA), and Esomeprazole (ESO) increased the area under the brain concentration-time curves (AUC) for sertraline by 2.02-, 3.18-, 3.04-, and 4.21-fold, respectively, after the 14-day administration of PPIs. Besides, PPIs significantly increased the permeability of sertraline in brain perfusion experiments, with PAN having the highest rank order, followed by ILA, OME, and ESO. In the tail suspension test (TST), co-administration PPI groups showed significantly shorter immobility time than the control group. In vitro, four PPIs inhibited sertraline efflux in breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP)-overexpressing MDCKII cells, and showed a mixed inhibition type. In this study, PPIs were further found to inhibit the mRNA and protein expression of brain BCRP. To sum up, the findings of this study revealed that PPIs could enhance the brain distribution and antidepressant effect of sertraline, which may be attributed to the inhibition of BCRP expression at the BBB by PPIs.


2-Pyridinylmethylsulfinylbenzimidazoles , Proton Pump Inhibitors , Sertraline , Animals , Mice , Proton Pump Inhibitors/pharmacology , ATP Binding Cassette Transporter, Subfamily G, Member 2/metabolism , Sertraline/pharmacology , Blood-Brain Barrier/metabolism , Neoplasm Proteins/metabolism , Omeprazole/pharmacology , Esomeprazole , Antidepressive Agents/pharmacology , Pantoprazole/pharmacology
13.
Helicobacter ; 29(1): e13040, 2024.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37983865

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Recently, vonoprazan-amoxicillin (VA) dual therapy has been reported as a promising approach for Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) eradication. However, the effects of VA therapy versus bismuth-containing quadruple therapy (BQT) on H. pylori eradication remains unclear. The objective of this meta-analysis was to compare the effects of VA dual therapy with BQT for H. pylori eradication. METHODS: A comprehensive search of the literature was conducted from the beginning to September 2023, utilizing PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library and Web of Science database. A random-effects model was used to perform a meta-analysis to determine the pooled relative risk (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Moreover, trial sequential analysis (TSA) was conducted to evaluate the conclusiveness of the H. pylori eradication rate. RESULTS: Six randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with 1233 patients were included. The VA therapy has similar eradication rate (ITT analysis: 87% vs. 85.7%, RR = 1.01, 95% CI: 0.93-1.09, p = 0.84; PP analysis: 92.5% vs. 93.2%, RR = 1.00, 95% CI: 0.94-1.06, p = 0.97) and compliance (RR = 1.01, 95% CI: 0.99-1.03, p = 0.32) compared to BQT. The VA therapy group had a significantly lower incidence of total adverse events than the BQT group (16.3% vs. 40.0%, RR = 0.45, 95% CI: 0.37-0.55, p < 0.00001). The TSA result showed that the effect was conclusive. CONCLUSIONS: Current evidence indicated that VA therapy is just as successful as BQT in eliminating H. pylori, yet it has fewer adverse events and similar compliance.


Amoxicillin , Anti-Bacterial Agents , Bismuth , Helicobacter Infections , Helicobacter pylori , Sulfonamides , Humans , Amoxicillin/adverse effects , Amoxicillin/pharmacology , Amoxicillin/therapeutic use , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Bismuth/adverse effects , Bismuth/pharmacology , Bismuth/therapeutic use , Drug Therapy, Combination , Helicobacter Infections/drug therapy , Helicobacter pylori/drug effects , Proton Pump Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Proton Pump Inhibitors/pharmacology , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Treatment Outcome , Sulfonamides/adverse effects , Sulfonamides/pharmacology , Sulfonamides/therapeutic use
14.
Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol ; 326(1): G38-G52, 2024 01 01.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37933466

In esophageal epithelial cells in eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE), Th2 cytokines (IL-4, IL-13) signal through IL-4Rα, activating JAK to increase eotaxin-3 secretion, which draws eosinophils into the mucosa. We explored whether Th2 cytokines also might stimulate eotaxin-3 secretion and increase tension in esophageal smooth muscle (ESM), which might impair esophageal distensibility, and whether those events could be blocked by proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) or agents that disrupt IL-4Rα signaling. We established human ESM cell cultures from organ donors, characterizing Th2 cytokine receptor and P-type ATPase expression by qPCR. We measured Th2 cytokine-stimulated eotaxin-3 secretion by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and ESM cell tension by gel contraction assay, before and after treatment with omeprazole, ruxolitinib (JAK inhibitor), or IL-4Rα blocking antibody. CPI-17 (inhibitor of a muscle-relaxing enzyme) effects were studied with CPI-17 knockdown by siRNA or CPI-17 phospho(T38A)-mutant overexpression. ESM cells expressed IL-4Rα and IL-13Rα1 but only minimal H+-K+-ATPase mRNA. Th2 cytokines increased ESM eotaxin-3 secretion and tension, effects blocked by ruxolitinib and IL-4Rα blocking antibody but not consistently blocked by omeprazole. IL-13 increased ESM tension by increasing CPI-17 expression and phosphorylation, effects blocked by CPI-17 knockdown. Blocking IL-4Rα decreased IL-13-stimulated eotaxin-3 secretion, CPI-17 expression, and tension in ESM. Th2 cytokines increase ESM eotaxin-3 secretion and tension via IL-4Rα signaling that activates CPI-17. Omeprazole does not reliably inhibit this process, but IL-4Rα blocking antibody does. This suggests that ESM eosinophilia and impaired esophageal distensibility might persist despite elimination of mucosal eosinophils by PPIs, and IL-4Rα blocking agents might be especially useful in this circumstance.NEW & NOTEWORTHY We have found that Th2 cytokines increase eotaxin-3 secretion and tension in esophageal smooth muscle (ESM) cells via IL-4Rα signaling. Unlike esophageal epithelial cells, ESM cells do not express H+-K+-ATPase, and omeprazole does not inhibit their cytokine-stimulated eotaxin-3 secretion or tension. An IL-4Rα blocking antibody reduces both eotaxin-3 secretion and tension induced by Th2 cytokines in ESM cells, suggesting that an agent such as dupilumab might be preferred for patients with EoE with esophageal muscle involvement.


Eosinophilic Esophagitis , Interleukin-13 , Humans , Adenosine Triphosphatases , Chemokine CCL26 , Cytokines/metabolism , Eosinophilic Esophagitis/metabolism , Interleukin-13/pharmacology , Muscle, Smooth/metabolism , Omeprazole , Proton Pump Inhibitors/pharmacology , Th2 Cells
15.
Clin Transl Gastroenterol ; 15(2): e00659, 2024 02 01.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37937851

INTRODUCTION: Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) modulate the progression of cirrhosis to hepatic encephalopathy (HE) and can affect the bacterial microbiome. However, the impact of PPI on the virome in cirrhosis using viral-like particle (VLP) analysis is unclear. METHODS: We determined the VLP in the stool microbiome in patients with cirrhosis cross-sectionally (ascites, HE, and PPI use analyzed) who were followed up for 6-month hospitalizations and through 2 clinical trials of PPI withdrawal and initiation. RESULTS: In a cross-sectional study, PPI users had greater ascites prevalence and 6-month hospitalizations, but VLP α diversity was similar. Among phages, PPI users had lower Autographviridae and higher Streptococcus phages and Herelleviridae than nonusers, whereas opposite trends were seen in ascites and HE. Trends of eukaryotic viruses (higher Adenoviridae and lower Virgaviridae/Smacoviridae) were similar for PPI, HE, and ascites. Twenty-one percent were hospitalized, mostly due to HE. α Diversity was similar in the hospitalized/nonhospitalized/not groups. Higher Gokushovirinae and lower crAssphages were related to hospitalizations such as HE-related cross-sectional VLP changes. As part of the clinical trial, PPIs were added and withdrawn in 2 different decompensated groups over 14 days. No changes in α diversity were observed. Withdrawal reduced crAssphages, and initiation reduced Gokushovirinae and Bacteroides phages. DISCUSSION: In cirrhosis, PPI use has a gut microbial VLP phage signature that is different from that in HE and ascites, and VLP changes are linked with hospitalizations over 6 months, independent of clinical biomarkers. Eukaryotic viral patterns were consistent across PPI use, HE, and ascites, indicating a relationship with the progression of cirrhosis. PPIs alone showed modest VLP changes with withdrawal or initiation. Distinct phage and eukaryotic viral patterns are associated with the use of PPIs in cirrhosis.


Bacteriophages , Gastrointestinal Microbiome , Hepatic Encephalopathy , Humans , Ascites/complications , Cross-Sectional Studies , Hepatic Encephalopathy/complications , Liver Cirrhosis/complications , Proton Pump Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Proton Pump Inhibitors/pharmacology , Clinical Trials as Topic
16.
Curr Gastroenterol Rep ; 25(12): 374-379, 2023 Dec.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37940812

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Barrett's esophagus (BE) is associated with chronic gastroesophageal reflux disease and is a known precursor to esophageal adenocarcinoma. While endoscopic surveillance strategies and the role for endoscopic eradication therapy have been well established, there has been much interest in identifying chemopreventive agents to disrupt or halt the metaplasia-dysplasia-carcinoma sequence in patients with BE. RECENT FINDINGS: No pharmacological agent has held more hope in reducing the risk of neoplastic progression in BE than proton pump inhibitors (PPIs). However, data supporting PPIs for chemoprevention have largely been from observational cohort and case-control studies with mixed results. In this review, we revisit the literature and highlight the role of PPIs in patients with BE as it pertains to chemoprophylaxis against the progression of BE to dysplasia and esophageal adenocarcinoma.


Adenocarcinoma , Barrett Esophagus , Esophageal Neoplasms , Humans , Barrett Esophagus/complications , Barrett Esophagus/drug therapy , Barrett Esophagus/pathology , Proton Pump Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Proton Pump Inhibitors/pharmacology , Esophageal Neoplasms/etiology , Esophageal Neoplasms/prevention & control , Adenocarcinoma/etiology , Adenocarcinoma/prevention & control , Chemoprevention/methods
18.
Arch Microbiol ; 205(9): 301, 2023 Aug 07.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37550555

Helicobacter pylori is considered one of the most prevalent human pathogenic microbes globally. It is the main cause of a number of gastrointestinal ailments, including peptic and duodenal ulcers, and gastric tumors with high mortality rates. Thus, eradication of H. pylori is necessary to prevent gastric cancer. Still, the rise in antibiotic resistance is the most important challenge for eradication strategies. Better consideration of H. pylori virulence factors, pathogenesis, and resistance is required for better eradication rates and, thus, prevention of gastrointestinal malignancy. This article is aimed to show the role of virulence factors of H. pylori. Some are involved in its survival in the harsh environment of the human gastric lumen, and others are related to pathogenesis and the infection process. Furthermore, this work has highlighted the recent advancement in H. pylori treatment, as well as antibiotic resistance as a main challenge in H. pylori eradication. Also, we tried to provide an updated summary of the evolving H. pylori control strategies and the potential alternative drugs to fight this lethal resistant pathogen. Recent studies have focused on evaluating the efficacy of alternative regimens (such as sequential, hybrid, concomitant treatment, vonoprazan (VPZ)-based triple therapy, high-dose PPI-amoxicillin dual therapy, probiotics augmented triple therapy, or in combination with BQT) in the effective eradication of H. pylori. Thus, innovating new anti-H. pylori drugs and establishing H. pylori databanks are upcoming necessities in the near future.


Helicobacter Infections , Helicobacter pylori , Humans , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Helicobacter pylori/genetics , Helicobacter Infections/drug therapy , Proton Pump Inhibitors/pharmacology , Proton Pump Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Drug Therapy, Combination
19.
J Neuroendocrinol ; 35(11): e13305, 2023 11.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37317882

The physiology of gastric acid secretion is one of the earliest subjects in medical literature and has been continuously studied since 1833. Starting with the notion that neural stimulation alone drives acid secretion, progress in understanding the physiology and pathophysiology of this process has led to the development of therapeutic strategies for patients with acid-related diseases. For instance, understanding the physiology of parietal cells led to the developments of histamine 2 receptor blockers, proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), and recently, potassium-competitive acid blockers. Furthermore, understanding the physiology and pathophysiology of gastrin has led to the development of gastrin/CCK2 receptor (CCK2 R) antagonists. The need for refinement of existing drugs in patients have led to second and third generation drugs with better efficacy at blocking acid secretion. Further understanding of the mechanism of acid secretion by gene targeting in mice has enabled us to dissect the unique role for each regulator to leverage and justify the development of new targeted therapeutics for acid-related disorders. Further research on the mechanism of stimulation of gastric acid secretion and the physiological significances of gastric acidity in gut microbiome is needed in the future.


Gastric Acid , Gastrins , Humans , Animals , Mice , Proton Pump Inhibitors/pharmacology , Parietal Cells, Gastric , Receptor, Cholecystokinin B
20.
BMC Microbiol ; 23(1): 171, 2023 06 19.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37337143

Mounting evidence has linked changes in human gut microbiota to proton pump inhibitor (PPI) use. Accordingly, multiple studies have analyzed the gut microbiomes of PPI users, but PPI-microbe interactions are still understudied. Here, we performed a meta-analysis of four studies with available 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing data to uncover the potential changes in human gut microbes among PPI users. Despite some differences, we found common features of the PPI-specific microbiota, including a decrease in the Shannon diversity index and the depletion of bacteria from the Ruminococcaceae and Lachnospiraceae families, which are crucial short-chain fatty acid-producers. Through training based on multiple studies, using a random forest classification model, we further verified the representativeness of the six screened gut microbial genera and 20 functional genes as PPI-related biomarkers, with AUC values of 0.748 and 0.879, respectively. Functional analysis of the PPI-associated 16S rRNA microbiome revealed enriched carbohydrate- and energy-associated genes, mostly encoding fructose-1,6-bisphosphatase and pyruvate dehydrogenase, among others. In this study, we have demonstrated alterations in bacterial abundance and functional metabolic potential related to PPI use, as a basis for future studies on PPI-induced adverse effects.


Gastrointestinal Microbiome , Microbiota , Humans , Proton Pump Inhibitors/pharmacology , Gastrointestinal Microbiome/genetics , RNA, Ribosomal, 16S/genetics , Feces/microbiology , Bacteria/genetics , Clostridiales/genetics
...